Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 47
STATE OF ALABAMA v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00696
Plaintiff: STATE OF ALABAMA
Defendant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN M. MCHUGH, JO-ELLEN DARCY and others
Movant: WATER WORKS & SANITARY SEWER BOARD OF THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
MISSOURI COALITION FOR THE ENVIRONMENT v. CORPS OF ENGINEERS
as 1:2015cv00520
Plaintiff: MISSOURI COALITION FOR THE ENVIRONMENT
Defendant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION et al v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01701
Plaintiff: NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION , OGEECHEE RIVERKEEPER and SAVANNAH RIVERKEEPER
Defendant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS , THOMAS P. BOSTICK and THOMAS J. TICKNER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Sierra Club, et al v. United States Army Corps, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5205
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sierra Club
Plaintiff - Appellee: National Wildlife Federation
Defendant - Appellee: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Thomas P. Bostick, in his official capacity as Commanding General and Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Richard A. Pratt, in his official capacity as Commander and District Engineer of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Enbridge Pipelines (FSP) L.L.C.
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2014cv00150
Plaintiff: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
PERMAPOST PRODUCTS, INC. et al v. MCHUGH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01736
Plaintiff: PERMAPOST PRODUCTS, INC. , TREATED WOOD COUNCIL , J. H. BAXTER & CO. and others
Defendant: JOHN M. MCHUGH , U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS , NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
National Association of Home, et al v. EPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-5290
Plaintiff - Appellant: National Association of Home Builders, Southern Arizona Home Builders Association and Home Builders Association of Central Arizona
Defendant - Appellee: Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy, in her official capacity as the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
MISSOURI COALITION FOR THE ENVIRONMENT
as 1:2013cv01449
Plaintiff: MISSOURI COALITION FOR THE ENVIRONMENT
Defendant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MISSOURI COALITION FOR THE ENVIRONMENT v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
as 1:2013cv01259
Plaintiff: MISSOURI COALITION FOR THE ENVIRONMENT
Defendant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
National Mining Association, et al v. Lisa Jackson, et al
as 12-5311
Plaintiff - Appellee: National Mining Association, Randy Huffman, Plaintiff in case 11-cv-295 RBW, In his official capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, and acting on behalf of the, State of West Virginia, Plaintiff in case 11-cv-295 RBW and others
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee: Commonwealth of Kentucky, In case no.:11-cv-446 RBW and City of Pikeville, Kentucky, In Case No.: 11-cv-446 RBW
Defendant - Appellee: Lisa Perez Jackson, sued in her official capacity, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, John M. McHugh, sued in his official capacity, Secretary of the Army and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellant: Sierra Club, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Coal River Mountain Watch and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?