Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CAMOFI Master LDC, et al v. Jerrold Pressman, et al
as 12-56755
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAMOFI MASTER LDC and CAMHZN MASTER LDC, derivatively on behalf of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant:
JERROLD PRESSMAN, LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP and U.S. AEROSPACE, INC., Nominal Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL GOLDBERG, KENNETH J. KOOCK, JAMES HENDERSON and others
David Defrees, et al v. John Kirkland, et al
as 12-56756
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID L. DEFREES, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc., SIMON GERSHON, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc. and FREDERICK RICH, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN C. KIRKLAND, KENNETH J. KOOCK, MICHAEL L. GOLDBERG and others
Defendant:
LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP, JERROLD S. PRESSMAN and U.S. AEROSPACE, INC., Nominal Defendant
CAMOFI Master LDC, et al v. Jerrold Pressman, et al
as 12-56385
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAMOFI MASTER LDC and CAMHZN MASTER LDC, derivatively on behalf of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant:
JERROLD PRESSMAN, LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP and U.S. AEROSPACE, INC., Nominal Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL GOLDBERG, KENNETH J. KOOCK, JAMES HENDERSON and others
David Defrees, et al v. John Kirkland, et al
as 12-56377
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID L. DEFREES, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc., SIMON GERSHON, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc. and FREDERICK RICH, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN C. KIRKLAND, KENNETH J. KOOCK, MICHAEL L. GOLDBERG and others
Defendant:
LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP, JERROLD S. PRESSMAN and U.S. AEROSPACE, INC., Nominal Defendant
David Defrees, et al v. John Kirkland, et al
as 12-55318
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID L. DEFREES, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc., SIMON GERSHON, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc. and FREDERICK RICH, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc.
Defendant:
JOHN C. KIRKLAND, MICHAEL C. CABRAL, JERROLD S. PRESSMAN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP
CAMOFI Master LDC, et al v. Jerrold Pressman, et al
as 12-55320
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAMOFI MASTER LDC and CAMHZN MASTER LDC, derivatively on behalf of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant:
JERROLD PRESSMAN, MICHAEL GOLDBERG, KENNETH J. KOOCK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP
David Defrees, et al v. John Kirkland, et al
as 12-55163
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID L. DEFREES, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc. and SIMON GERSHON, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc.
Defendant:
JOHN C. KIRKLAND, LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP, MICHAEL C. CABRAL and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JERROLD S. PRESSMAN, KENNETH J. KOOCK, MICHAEL L. GOLDBERG and others
CAMOFI Master LDC, et al v. Jerrold Pressman, et al
as 12-55155
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAMOFI MASTER LDC and CAMHZN MASTER LDC, derivatively on behalf of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant:
JERROLD PRESSMAN, MICHAEL GOLDBERG, KENNETH J. KOOCK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN C. KIRKLAND
CAMOFI Master LDC, et al v. Jerrold Pressman, et al
as 12-55160
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAMOFI MASTER LDC and CAMHZN MASTER LDC, derivatively on behalf of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant - Appellant:
JERROLD PRESSMAN, MICHAEL GOLDBERG, KENNETH J. KOOCK and others
Defendant:
JOHN C. KIRKLAND, LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP and U.S. AEROSPACE, INC., Nominal Defendant
David Defrees, et al v. John Kirkland, et al
as 12-55144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID L. DEFREES, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc. and SIMON GERSHON, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN C. KIRKLAND
Defendant:
LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP, MICHAEL C. CABRAL, JERROLD S. PRESSMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
