Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Romelus v. Brandsmart U.S.A. of Florida, Inc.
as 1:2012cv23852
Plaintiff:
Omelise Romelus
Defendant:
Brandsmart U.S.A. of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Termine v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
as 0:2012cv60694
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Termine
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0626
Stewart v. U.S.A. Auto Care, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv60262
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stewart
Defendant:
U.S.A. Auto Care, Inc. and Nour Albandakji
Mediator:
Neil Flaxman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Miller v. Strong Arm Productions, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv20335
Plaintiff:
Mahogany Miller
Defendant:
Strong Arm Productions, U.S.A., Inc. and Tramar Dillard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Romero v. BrandsMart, U.S.A., Inc
as 1:2011cv24185
Defendant:
BrandsMart, U.S.A., Inc and Brandsmart USA Dadeland, LLC
Plaintiff:
Orlando Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patterson v. U.S.A. Broadband Wireless Corp.
as 0:2010cv62123
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Patterson
Defendant:
U.S.A. Broadband Wireless Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Cleare v. Caribe Inflatables, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv23355
Defendant:
Caribe Inflatables, U.S.A., Inc. and Domenico Fossati
Plaintiff:
Ethon Cleare
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Agudelo v. U.S.A. Broadband Wireless Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv23452
Plaintiff:
Julio Agudelo
Defendant:
U.S.A. Broadband Wireless Corp., Andres Diaz and AT&T Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tanner v. Foods U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 9:2009cv82167
Plaintiff:
Robert Tanner and Robert Tanner
Defendant:
Foods U.S.A., Inc. and Michael Drew
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Winter v. Holcombe U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv61702
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Winter
Defendant:
Holcombe U.S.A., Inc. and Paul Rogers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
