Cases 121 - 130 of 134
ChevronTexaco Explor, et al v. FERC
as 03-1153
Petitioner:
ChevronTexaco Exploration & Production Co., a Division of Chevron U.S.A. Inc., BP America Production Company, BP Energy Company and others
Terminated Party:
Hunt Oil Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C., Duke Energy Fuels, L.P., Process Gas Consumers Group and others
Williams Companies, et al v. FERC
as 02-5056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The Williams Companies, Inc. and Dynegy Midstream Services, Limited Partnership
Defendant - Appellant:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Devon Energy Corporation, Dominion Exploration & Production, Inc., Forest Oil Corporation and others
Intervenor:
Chevron USA, Inc., Exxon Mobil Corporation, Shell Offshore, Inc. and others
Kiska Const Corp, et al v. WMATA
as 01-7156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kiska Construction Corporation, U.S.A., A Partner in KISKA-KAJIMA, A Joint Venture and Kajima Engineering and Construction, Incorporated, A Partner in KISKA-KAJIMA, A Joint Venture
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Williams Gas Proc, et al v. FERC
as 01-1327
Petitioner:
Williams Gas Processing - Gulf Coast Company, L. P. and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Dynegy Marketing and Trade, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, doing business as KeySpan Energy Delivery New York, KeySpan Gas East Corporation, doing business as KeySpan Energy Delivery Long Island and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Chevron USA, Inc. and others
Intervenor - Intervenor:
BP America Production Company, BP Energy Company, Delmarva Power & Light Company and others
Empagran SA, et al v. F Hoffman-Laroche, et al
as 01-7115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Empagran S.A., Nutricion Animal S.A., Winddridge Pig Farm and others
Defendant / Appellee:
F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., Rhone-Poulenc Animal Nutrition Inc. and others
Defendant:
Daiichi Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. and Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, Federal Trade Commission, United States Council for International Business and others
Empagran SA, et al v. F Hoffman-Laroche, et al
as 01-7115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Empagran S.A., Nutricion Animal S.A., Winddridge Pig Farm and others
Defendant - Appellee:
F. Hoffmann-Laroche, Ltd., Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., Rhone-Poulenc Animal Nutrition Inc. and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Daiichi Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. and Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd.
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
United States of America, Federal Trade Commission, United States Council for International Business and others
Pub Util Cmsn St CA v. FERC
as 99-1390
Petitioner:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
El Paso Municipal Customer Group, Amoco Production Company, Citizens Utilities Company and others
:
Purepac Pharm Co v. Friedman, Michael A.
as 98-5334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Purepac Pharmaceutical Company
Intervenor For Plaintiff:
Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. and Invamed Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael A. Friedman, Acting Commissioner of Food and Drugs Administration
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Torpharm, Inc., A Division of Apotex, Inc, Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc. and Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc
Kiska Const Corp, et al v. WMATA
as 98-7091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kiska Construction Corporation, U.S.A. and Kajima Engineering and Construction, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Iroquois Gas Transm v. FERC
as 98-1081
Petitioner:
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Iroquois Non-Owner Shipper Group, Bay State Gas Company, Boston Gas Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
ProGas U.S.A., Inc.
:
and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
