Cases 1 - 8 of 8
A. v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv15739
Plaintiff:
K A
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company and United Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
C.W. v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv04245
Plaintiff:
C.W.
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company, United Behavioral Health, Steifel Financial Corp Savings Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Megan Daniels, et al v. United Healthcare Services, Inc., et al
as 22-2210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEGAN DANIELS, BETSY DANIELS and CHRIS DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. and UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Daniels, Megan et al v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01038
Plaintiff:
Megan Daniels, Chris Daniels and Betsy Daniels
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services, Inc. and United Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. United Health Care Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01135
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Crawford
Defendant:
United Health Care Group, Inc., United Health Care Group, United Health Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pacific Shores Hospital v. United Behavioral Health
as 3:2011mc00010
Plaintiff:
Pacific Shores Hospital
Defendant:
United Behavioral Health
Doe et al v. United Healthcare of the Midwest Inc et al
as 3:2009cv01053
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Jane Doe, 1 and Jane Doe, 2
Defendant:
United Healthcare of the Midwest Inc, United Healthcare of Illinois, Inc. and United Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Schanot v. United Healthcare of Illinois, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00724
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Schanot
Defendant:
United Healthcare of Illinois, Inc. and United Behavioral Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
