Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 64
In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018md02819
Defendant: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: Allergan, Inc., 1199SEIU Greater New York Benefit Fund, 1199SEIU Licensed Practical Nurses Welfare Fund and others
In Re: In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Petitioner: Akorn Inc.
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Doe v. Rabobank Welfare Benefit Plan et al
as 1:2021cv02177
Defendant: UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, Rabobank Welfare Benefit Plan
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
SurgiCare of Manhattan v. United Healthcare Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00669
Defendant: UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: SURGICARE OF MANHATTAN
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company et al v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv10664
Plaintiff: UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Defendant: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kastner v. Tri State Eye
as 20-3671
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joseph R.E. Kastner
Defendant: Third Party CIGNA, United States of America, All Represented by the US Attorney through the US Food & Drug Administration, USA et al. through the EEOC, through the "SSAUSA" et al.The US Inspector General,USA et al., United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Defendant / Appellee: Tri State Eye, et al., Crystal Run Healthcare, Coverys RFG, Inc., is serviced by ProSelect Insurance Company, CRHC REP #1 Mr. Douglas Sansted(Esq. Not LLP) CRHC Rep. #2 Kristen Larson Doyle(Esq Not LLP) Jeffrey Feldman Doyle(Esq not LLP) are all reps of FKC&S CRHC exclusiv, Feldman, Kleidman, Coffey & Sappe, Attorneys at Law FKC&S Rep #1 Kristen Larsen Doyle (Esq Not LLP) are all Reps of FKC&S CRHC Exclusively Esqs. and others
Plaintiff: Jane and John Doe 1-20, Personal Injury / Pain Suffering, Emotional Physical Psychological Distress Litigation, and Lost Income of 32 Years Past, Present and Future, Civil Rights, Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury, Civil Rights with High Prejudice
Podiatric OR Of Midtown Manhattan, P.C. v. United Health Group Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09333
Defendant: Oxford Health Plans LLC, United Healthcare Services, Inc., United Health Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Podiatric OR Of Midtown Manhattan, P.C., Podiatric OR Of Midtown Manhattan, P.C. as the Assignee of various Patients named in the within complaint
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Coverage
SurgiCare of Manhattan v. United Healthcare Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv06304
Defendant: UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: SURGICARE OF MANHATTAN
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Usal, M.D. v. Oxford Health Plans, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03388
Plaintiff: HAKAN USAL, M.D.
Defendant: UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, Oxford Health Plans, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity Action
Type: Contract Insurance
Hakan Usal, M.D. v. United HealthCare Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv04405
Plaintiff: HAKAN USAL, M.D.
Defendant: UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.
Atlantic Neurosurgical Specialists, PA v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv04005
Defendant: UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, Oxford Health Plans, Inc.
Plaintiff: ATLANTIC NEUROSURGICAL SPECIALISTS, PA, on behalf of PATIENT AM
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?