Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BYRNE, TALLY HO FARMS PARTNERSHIP, DBA Walker Brothers, TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff:
WATERWATCH OF OREGON, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of the Interior, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OREGON WILD, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, WATERWATCH OF OREGON, An Oregon nonprofit corporation and AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, An Oregon nonprofit corporation
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
WOODHOUSE FARMING AND SEED COMPANY, TALLY HO FARMS PARTNERSHIP, DBA Walker Brothers, MICHAEL BYRNE and others
Plaintiff:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of the Interior, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35509
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BYRNE, TALLY HO FARMS PARTNERSHIP, DBA Walker Brothers, TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WATERWATCH OF OREGON, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, An Oregon nonprofit corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of the Interior, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
IEN, et al v. DOS, et al
as 19-35036
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS A. SHANNON, Jr., in his official capacity as U.S. Under Secretary of State, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JAMES W. KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
TRANSCANADA CORPORATION and TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK and NORTH COAST RIVERS ALLIANCE
Amicus Curiae:
ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES OF THE FORT PECK RESERVATION
Western Watersheds Project v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 13-55027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
BRIGHTSOURCE ENERGY, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, BOB ABBEY, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management, MIKE POOL, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Western Watersheds Project v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 11-56363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
BRIGHTSOURCE ENERGY, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, BOB ABBEY, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management, MIKE POOL, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
