Miller Act Cases filed in Hawaii
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States of America for the Use of Heide & Cook, LLC v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland et al
as 1:2017cv00115
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use of Heide & Cook, LLC
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland , Talion Construction, LLC , Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
Commercial Electric, Inc. v. Environet, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00553
Defendant: Environet, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use of Commercial Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Salinas Construction, Inc. et al v. David Boland, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00487
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Salinas Construction, Inc, United States of America for the use and benefit of Salinas Construction, Inc. and Salinas Construction, Inc.
Defendant: David Boland, Inc, JT Construction Enterprises Corporation, Western Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Arekat Pacific Security, Inc. v. RWT L.L.C.
as 1:2016cv00442
Defendant: RWT L.L.C., John Does 1-20, Doe Governmental Agencies 1-20 and others
Plaintiff: Arekat Pacific Security, Inc. and Arekat Pacific Security, Inc. United States of America for the use and benefit of Arekate Pacific Security, Inc. a Hawaii Corporation doing business as API Security
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for use and benefit of KH Electric, Inc. et al v. Environet, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00500
Plaintiff: United States of America for use and benefit of KH Electric, Inc. and KH Electric, Inc.
Defendant: Environet, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
Canam Steel Corporation v. Walsh Construction Company
as 1:2015cv00302
Plaintiff: United States of America and Canam Steel Corporation
Defendant: Walsh Construction Company and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Bergelectric Corp., and as assignee of the United States of America for the use and benefit of Big Island Electric, Inc. v. DCK-ECC Pacific, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00296
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Bergelectric Corp., and as assignee of the United States of America for the use and benefit of Big Island Electric, Inc. , Bergelectric Corp. and Big Island Electric, Inc.
Defendant: DCK-ECC Pacific, LLC and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Star Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv00133
Plaintiff: United States of America , Trustees of the Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Local Union No. 740 Welfare Fund , Trustees of the Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Joint Apprenticeship and Journeyman Training Fund and others
Defendant: Star Insurance Company and Walsh Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Jacobsen Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00627
Plaintiff: United States of America and Advanced Welding & Steel, Inc.
Defendant: Jacobsen Construction Company, Inc., PMJ Fabrication & Welding, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Walsh Construction Company et al
as 1:2013cv00449
Plaintiff: United States of America and C.R. Laurence Co., Inc.
Defendant: Walsh Construction Company and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?