Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Barbaran et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 9:2019cv80568
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Penske Truck Leasing Co., UPS Ground Freight, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Horacio Barbaran and Roxsana Barbaran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
China Bird HK Ltd v. UPS Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv24436
Plaintiff:
China Bird HK Ltd
Defendant:
UPS Capital Corporation, UPS Capital Insurance Brokers Ltd, UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratliff et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00893
Plaintiff:
Richard O Ratliff, Jr. , Robert D Ratliff and B. B.
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and UPS Supply Chain Solutions Inc.
Third_party_defendant:
Classic Transport, Inc.
Third_party_plaintiff:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and UPS Supply Chain Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dunakin et al v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2011cv22332
Plaintiff:
Ray Dunakin , Daniel D. Fitzgerald , William E. Harilson and others
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
National Liability & Fire Insurance Company v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2010cv20608
Plaintiff:
National Liability & Fire Insurance Company and National Liability & Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. and UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1502 Air Transportation (Warsaw Convention)
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. v. Solectron Industrial Comercial Servicos et al
as 1:2008cv20331
Plaintiff:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Solectron Industrial Comercial Servicos and Zurich Brasil Seguros, SA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. v. Southern Tools & Parts, LLC
as 9:2007cv80342
Plaintiff:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Southern Tools & Parts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
