Cases 1 - 10 of 406
Santana Isaac v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04015
Petitioner:
Jeisy Santana Isaac
Defendant:
Aledandro Mayorkas, Director UR M JADDOU and Director Kevin J. Riddle
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hamid v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03913
Plaintiff:
Huma Hamid
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, UR M JADDOU, Acting District Dir. Mark HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SANCHEZ LIVIA v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03810
Plaintiff:
LISBET SANCHEZ LIVIA
Defendant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, DIRECTOR OF USCIS UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Sanchez Livia v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03811
Plaintiff:
LISBET SANCHEZ LIVIA
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas, DIRECTOR OF USCIS UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
SANCHEZ LIVIA v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03772
Plaintiff:
LISBET SANCHEZ LIVIA
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas, UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
