Cases 1 - 3 of 3
US Airways, Inc. v. Don Addington, et al
as 13-15000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
US AIRWAYS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
DON ADDINGTON, JOHN BOSTIC, MARK BURMAN and others
Don Addington, et al v. US Airline Pilots Association, et al
as 09-16564
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DON ADDINGTON, individual resident of the State of Arizona, formerly employed by America West Airlines, Inc. and presently employed by its successor after merger, US Airways, Inc., JOHN BOSTIC, individual resident of the State of Arizona formerly employed by America West Airlines, Inc. and presently employed by its successor after merger, US Airways, Inc., MARK BURMAN, individual resident of the State of Arizona, formerly employed by America West Airlines, Inc. and presently employed by its successor after merger, US Airways, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
US AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association representing the pilots in the employment of US Airways, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, INC., a Delaware corporation, STEPHAN BRADFORD, ROBERT DAVISON and others
US Airline Pilots Association v. Don Addington, et al
as 09-80051
Petitioner:
US AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association representing the pilots in the employment of US Airways, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Respondent:
DON ADDINGTON, individual resident of the State of Arizona, formerly employed by America West Airlines, Inc. and presently employed by its successor after merger, US Airways, Inc., JOHN BOSTIC, individual resident of the State of Arizona formerly employed by America West Airlines, Inc. and presently employed by its successor after merger, US Airways, Inc., MARK BURMAN, individual resident of the State of Arizona, formerly employed by America West Airlines, Inc. and presently employed by its successor after merger, US Airways, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
