Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Missouri Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City et al v. Midwest Dermatology, P.A. et al
as 5:2012mc00406
Plaintiff:
Missouri Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City and USA
Defendant:
Midwest Dermatology, P.A., CFMO Irrevocable Trust and CFMWD, LLC
Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Cadbury Adams Canada, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02209
Plaintiff:
Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
Defendant:
Cadbury Adams Canada, Inc. , Cadbury Adams USA, LLC , Cadbury Holdings LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Meiners v. Kramer and Frank, P.C. et al
as 2:2011cv02623
Plaintiff:
Phyllis A. Meiners
Defendant:
Kramer and Frank, P.C. and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ateliers de la Haute Garonne et al v. Broetje Automation-USA Inc. et al
as 6:2011mc00113
Plaintiff:
Ateliers de la Haute Garonne and F2CS Systems, S.A.S
Defendant:
Broetje Automation-USA Inc. and Broetje Automation GMBH
Movant:
Spirit Aerosystems, Inc.
Riederer v. ACE USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2011mc00223
Plaintiff:
Albert A. Riederer
Defendant:
ACE USA, Inc. , American International Group, Inc. , America First Insurance Co. and others
Riederer v. ACE USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2011mc00224
Plaintiff:
Albert A. Riederer
Defendant:
ACE USA, Inc. , American International Group, Inc. , America First Insurance Co. and others
Riederer v. ACE USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2011mc00222
Plaintiff:
Albert A. Riederer
Defendant:
ACE USA, Inc. , American International Group, Inc. , America First Insurance Co. and others
Glen J. Lerner, P.C. et al v. Sackett et al
as 6:2011mc00105
Plaintiff:
Glen J. Lerner, P.C. and Glen J. Lerner
Defendant:
Richard Sackett, Lawco USA, PLLC and Group Matrix, Inc.
Movant:
Patterson Burk, L.C.
Bush v. Kramer & Frank, P.C. et al
as 2:2011cv02036
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Bush
Defendant:
Kramer & Frank, P.C. and Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
