Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Gorbey v. Warden
as 24-2155
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP Coleman 1
Gorbey v. Sickle, et al.
as 24-2145
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
SICKLE, Associate Warden, USP Victorville Cal., GORE, Mr., First Name Unknown, Captain USP Victorville, Cal., JOHN DOE, SIS Staff, USP Victorville Cal. and others
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 24-1917
Plaintiff:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Federal Agency at USP Tucson
Bells v. NDA, et al.
as 24-1085
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, JR.
Defendant:
VICTORVILLE USP CORRECTIONS NDA, SHINN, MCCOLLOUGH and others
Torres-Hurtado v. United States of America
as 23-2284
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE TORRES-HURTADO and Miguel Angel Corraliza Sanchez
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USP Lompoc Warden
Majid Alfarag v. USPS, et al
as 23-35602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAJID ALFARAG
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Lakewood, Washington Store, USPS CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY CONTACT OFFICE and USPS OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Zaragosa-Solis v. Gutierrez, et al.
as 23-1808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
M GUTIERREZ, complex warden, Unknown UNKNOWN CHRISTENSEN, PREA Lt., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, federal agency and others
Jones v. United States of America, et al.
as 23-1789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD JOSEPH JONES, III
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, named as United States, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, named as United States Dept. of Justice, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Jimmy Lee Eisenhour v. USDC-AZT
as 23-70078
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JIMMY LEE ANTHONY EISENHOUR, M GUTIERREZ, Complez Warden, USP Tucson, AZ, J PADDEN, Dentist, USP Tucson, AZ and others
Petitioner:
JIMMY LEE ANTHONY EISENHOUR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
