Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Justin Mahwikizi v. Thomas M. Durkin
as 23-3369
Petitioner:
JUSTIN MAHWIKIZI
Respondent:
THOMAS M. DURKIN
Interested Party:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER, LLC
Mahwikizi v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03680
Plaintiff:
Justin Mahwikizi
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Raiser, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv03608
Plaintiff:
Justin Mahwikizi
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc. and Raiser, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2021cv03260
Defendant:
Rasier LLC, Littler Mendelson PC, Uber Technologies Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Abdul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kirk Jones v. Kevin Ramos, et al
as 20-2017
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL J. WATERHOUSE, MARIO A. RAMOS, JERILYNN LANGWITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIRK C. JONES
Robert Shapiro v. IRS, et al
as 20-2013
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON, INC., POSTMATES, TARGET and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT SHAPIRO
Access Living of Metropolitan, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 19-2116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAHNEE PATRICK and ACCESS LIVING OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Maria Vergara, et al v. Kerry Sweeney
as 18-1659
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARIA VERGARA, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, SANDEEP PAL, JENNIFER REILLY and others
Appellant:
KERRY A. SWEENEY
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Patni et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08709
Plaintiff:
Junaid Patni , Charlene Marsh and Kimberly Crawl
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Rasier, LLC , Travis Kalanick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
