Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mendoza v. United Financial Casualty Company
as 2:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Talusan Mendoza
Defendant:
United Financial Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Chipman v. Lyft, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
James Chipman
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and United Financial Casualty Company (Progressive Insurance Company)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
United Financial Casualty Company v. Premo et al
as 3:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
United Financial Casualty Company
Defendant:
Matthew Premo, Premo Concrete Construction, Edward Montanucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
White v. Progressive Insurance
as 2:2022cv01626
Plaintiff:
Charles White
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance and United Financial Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Peterson et al v. United Financial Casualty Company
as 2:2022cv01509
Defendant:
John Peterson and United Financial Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Franzen v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00401
Defendant:
Robert Franzen, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and United Financial Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Nguyen v. United Financial Casualty Company et al
as 2:2022cv00741
Plaintiff:
Tin V. Nguyen
Defendant:
Progressive Commercial Advantage Agency, Inc., Lyft, Inc. and United Financial Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Traynor v. Colorado Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv00251
Defendant:
Colorado Casualty Insurance Company and United Financial Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Michael Traynor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
