Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
ComAv, LLC, et al v. Southern California Logistics, et al
as 17-55352
Plaintiff - Appellant: COMAV, LLC, a California limited liability company, COMAV TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY, a joint powers authority, CITY OF VICTORVILLE, California, a municipal corporation, PRATT AND WHITNEY LINE MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC., a division of United Technologies Corporation and others
United States of America v. United Health Group, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv08697
Defendant: UnitedHealth Group Inc, Pacificare of Nevada Inc, Health Net Inc and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Alan Friedman
Plaintiff: United States of America, Benjamin Poehling
Special Master: Judge Suzanne H. Segal
Cause Of Action: False Claims Act
In re: REV 973 LLC v. USDC-CALA
as 16-72624
: In re: REV 973 LLC, a California limited liability company
Petitioner: REV 973 LLC, a California limited liability company
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: JOHN MOUREN-LAURENS, an individual, MIREILLE MOUREN-LAURENS, an individual, MOUREN-LAURENS OIL COMPANY, a corporation and others
United States for the use and benefit of National Construction and Maintenance, Inc. et al v. Pacific Plumbing Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00609
Plaintiff: United States for the use and benefit of National Construction and Maintenance, Inc., National Construction and Maintenance, Inc.
Defendant: Pacific Plumbing Service, Inc., Twins Roofing, Inc., International Fidelity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: ma Diversity-Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States et alv. Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00150
Defendant: Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc., Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Plaintiff: United States, Teras Construction LLC
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Teras Construction, LLC v. H&H DMS Joint Venture et al
as 3:2016cv05078
Plaintiff: Teras Construction, LLC , United States
Defendant: H&H DMS Joint Venture, H & H Builders, Inc., Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company, LLC v. United Construction & Maintenance Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03483
Defendant: Suretec Insurance Company, United Construction & Maintenance Inc.
Plaintiff: Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company, LLC
Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center LLC et al v. UnitedHealth Group Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02139
Defendant: Wolverine Worldwide Flexible Spending Account Plan, Monrovia Nursery Company Employee Benefit Plan, Future Electronics Corp. and others
Plaintiff: West Hills Surgery Center LLC, San Joaquin Valley Surgery Center LLC, Palmdale Surgery Center LLC and others
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Manuel Souza v. Great American E & S Insurance, et al
as 13-17268
Plaintiff - Appellant: MANUEL SOUZA, United States for the use and benefit of Manuel Souza, DBA Souza Construction
Defendant - Appellee: GREAT AMERICAN E & S INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, H + H - DMS JOINT VENTURE, H + H BUILDERS, INC., a Utah Corporation and others
Type: Contract Miller Act
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. United Construction and Maintenance Inc et al
as 2:2011cv06984
Defendant: American Contractors Indemnity Company, United Construction and Maintenance Inc
Plaintiff: Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?