Cases 1 - 10 of 53
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Kowalski
as 1:2024cv02033
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
William A Kowalski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Tito Marrero v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 24-1046
Plaintiff:
TITO E. MARRERO
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, JENNIFER WRIGHT, Loan Officer, SHARON MIDDLEBROOKS and others
Harvey Cantrell v. DVA
as 23-2669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARVEY D. CANTRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Harmon v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.
as 3:2023cv01643
Plaintiff:
Sue Harmon
Defendant:
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Binder v. United States Polo Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02910
Plaintiff:
Demetra Binder
Defendant:
United States Polo Association, Inc., USPA Properties, Inc. and Does 1-50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
USA, et al v. Ajibola Ayeni, et al
as 23-1794
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROXANNE KLINE
Defendant / Appellant:
AJIBOLA A. AYENI and DOCS AT THE DOOR, P.C.
Emily Castillo, et al v. Unilever United States, Inc., et al
as 23-1178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMILY CASTILLO, SHANNON KEENER, GUSTAVO FLORES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. and CONOPCO, INC.
Earl et al v. Unilever United States Inc.
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Earl and Jeanette Rock
Defendant:
Unilever United States Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Burdell Vaughn v. Denis McDonough, et al
as 22-3244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BURDELL VAUGHN
Defendant / Appellee:
DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, and others
Sims v. Unilever United States Inc.
as 1:2022cv06140
Plaintiff:
Lawanda Sims
Defendant:
Unilever United States Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
