Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 31,914
Bowman, et al. v. Novad Management Consulting, LLC, et al.
as 24-3063
Plaintiff: KEYUBBA BOWMAN and RASHON BOWMAN
Defendant: NOVAD MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, LLC, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Corporation, ISN CORPORATION, a Maryland Corporation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3053
Petitioner: KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party: FAYE CHESS, ANN DAVIDSON, ADAM EISENBERG and others
Lawless v. United States of America
as 24-3075
Plaintiff: RICHARD R. LAWLESS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McLean v. Gutierrez, et al.
as 24-3086
Plaintiff: LENROY MCLEAN
Defendant: PHILLIP GUTIERREZ, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, FNU HERNANDEZ, Office Staff, in his/her individual capacity, FNU JENKINS, Unit Manager, in his/her individual and official capacity and others
United States of America v. Lillard
as 24-3058
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LONNIE LILLARD
Borden v. DOJ - United States Department of Justice, et al.
as 24-3072
Plaintiff: RONALD L. BORDEN
Defendant: DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Case #1, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Case #1, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Case #2 and others
United States of America v. Gross
as 24-3079
Defendant: JEFFREY L. GROSS and Loran Gross
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Werk
as 24-3082
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DANIEL JACOB WERK
United States of America v. Boylan
as 24-3077
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JERRY NEHL BOYLAN
United States of America v. Viana-Hernandez
as 24-3084
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JUAN VIANA-HERNANDEZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?