Cases filed in Hawaii
United States of America for the use and benefit of Salinas Construction, Inc. et al v. David Boland, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00487
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Salinas Construction, Inc, United States of America for the use and benefit of Salinas Construction, Inc. and Salinas Construction, Inc.
Defendant: David Boland, Inc, JT Construction Enterprises Corporation, Western Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Arekat Pacific Security, Inc. v. RWT L.L.C.
as 1:2016cv00442
Defendant: RWT L.L.C., John Does 1-20, Doe Governmental Agencies 1-20 and others
Plaintiff: Arekat Pacific Security, Inc. and Arekat Pacific Security, Inc. United States of America for the use and benefit of Arekate Pacific Security, Inc. a Hawaii Corporation doing business as API Security
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Bergelectric Corp., and as assignee of the United States of America for the use and benefit of Big Island Electric, Inc. v. DCK-ECC Pacific, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00296
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Bergelectric Corp., and as assignee of the United States of America for the use and benefit of Big Island Electric, Inc. , Bergelectric Corp. and Big Island Electric, Inc.
Defendant: DCK-ECC Pacific, LLC and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of MWH Constructors, Inc. v. DWG & Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00457
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of MWH Constructors, Inc. and MWH Constructors, Inc.
Defendant: DWG & Associates, Inc. and Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?