Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Hawthorne v. O'Malley
as 24-1982
Plaintiff:
CHERYL V. L. HAWTHORNE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Armstrong et al v. Fite et al
as 5:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Todd Armstrong and Donna Armstrong
Defendant:
Vinson Fite, Lenora Fite, Fite Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
S.L. et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
S. L., V. L. and Carolyn Campbell
Defendant:
County of Riverside, DOES 1-10, inclusive. and Does 11-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
G.L. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
G. L., Gary Le, Vanessa Le and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Kenel Joseph v. K. Williams, et al
as 23-13237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENEL JOSEPH
Defendant / Appellee:
K. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, M. NEAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Hawthorne v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv03530
Defendant:
Cheryl V. L. Hawthorne, Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Kilolo Kijakazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. V&L ASSOCIATES OF MARLTON, L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv02435
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
V&L ASSOCIATES OF MARLTON, L.P., JOSE LESCANO and MIRTHA MORAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Godhigh v. Florida State Prison et al
as 3:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
Florida State Prison, Department of Corrections and V. L. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
L. et al v. Maplebrook School , Inc.
as 7:2022cv05287
Plaintiff:
E. L., S. L. and V. L.
Defendant:
Maplebrook School, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
