Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Brandenburg et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01714
Plaintiff:
Rollin Brandenburg and Elaine Brandenburg
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , American Biltrite Co. , Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
American Biltrite Co. , Aurora Pump Company and Cleaver-Brooks Inc.
Cross_defendant:
American Biltrite Co. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davies et al v. Aurora Pump Company et al
as 1:2013cv01112
Plaintiff:
Randall C. Davies and Linda Davies
Defendant:
Aurora Pump Company, BW/IP Inc., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
IMO Industries Inc.
Cross_defendant:
IMO Industries Inc. , Aurora Pump Company, BW/IP Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Shaffer v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv01113
Plaintiff:
Dottie Ann Shaffer
Defendant:
3M Company, American Standard Inc., Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Borg-Warner Corporation , Eaton Corporation, General Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Borg-Warner Corporation , 3M Company, American Standard Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00831
Plaintiff:
Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company, IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windlass Company
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00835
Plaintiff:
Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windless Company
Cross_defendant:
IMO Industries Inc. , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , AO Smith Corporation, Advance Auto Parts Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc. and Ericsson Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc., 84 Lumber Company , AGCO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dumas v. ABB Group Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00229
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dumas
Defendant:
ABB Group Inc., Atlas Copco Compressors LLC , Buffalo Pumps Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company, ABB Group Inc., Atlas Copco Compressors LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2012cv01227
Defendant:
American Biltrite Inc., CNH America LLC, HB Smith Company Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sellers v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Donald Sellers
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc., Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
John Crane Inc. , Cyprus Amax Minerals Company , CBS Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc., Armstrong International Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company , CBS Corporation , Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and others
Counter_defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Kaiser Gypsum Company Inc., H & S Lumber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bass v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00564
Plaintiff:
James D. Bass, Jr.
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Pecial_master:
Vincent J. Poppiti, (SM)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
