Cases 1 - 6 of 6
COMMITTEE OF 100 ON THE FEDERAL CITY v. FOXX et al
as 1:2014cv01903
Defendant:
ANTHONY FOXX , VICTOR MENDEZ , GINA MCCARTHY and others
Plaintiff:
COMMITTEE OF 100 ON THE FEDERAL CITY
Intervenor_defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
SCENIC AMERICA, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 1:2013cv00093
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAY LAHOOD, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
SCENIC AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
DETROIT INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE COMPANY et al v. GOVERNMENT OF CANADA et al
as 1:2010cv00476
Plaintiff:
DETROIT INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE COMPANY and CANADIAN TRANSIT COMPANY
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, UNITED STATES FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, VICTOR MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES et al v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2009cv01695
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES and RIVER FIELDS, INC.
Defendant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, VICTOR MENDEZ and JOSE SEPULVEDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
COUNTY BOARD OF ARLINGTON VIRGINIA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 1:2009cv01570
Plaintiff:
COUNTY BOARD OF ARLINGTON VIRGINIA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAYMOND H. LAHOOD, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BERGMANN v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 1:2009cv01378
Plaintiff:
DIETRICH R. BERGMANN
Defendant:
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAY LAHOOD, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
