Cases 11 - 20 of 38
The People of the State of Illinois et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al
as 3:2020cv03059
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of Illinois, The People of Sangamon County and County of Sangamon
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, CVS Health Corporation, Individually, Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Brown-Davis et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2019cv05392
Plaintiff:
Lisa Smith, Kristie Kolacny, Siobhan E. Fannin and others
Defendant:
The Retirement Plan Committee of the Walgreen Profit-Sharing Retirement Trust, Walgreen Co., Does 1-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Brown v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
as 1:2018cv07585
Plaintiff:
Erika Brown, Lisa Satchel, Phyllis Gray and others
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joshi et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2018cv03626
Plaintiff:
Jay Joshi and National Pain Centers, LLC
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tersip v. Walgreens
as 1:2018cv02493
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Tersip
Defendant:
Walgreens, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
J&S Community Pharmacy Inc v. Prime Therapeutics LLC et al
as 1:2017cv06837
Plaintiff:
J&S Community Pharmacy Inc
Defendant:
Prime Therapeutics LLC , Walgreen Co. , Healthcare Services Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Grabstald v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
as 1:2017cv05789
Plaintiff:
David Grabstald
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Crocs, Inc. v. U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11238
Plaintiff:
Crocs, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. , Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd. , Effervescent, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
