Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Berezin v. Croskrey et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Samuel Berezin
Defendant:
Stephen E. Croskrey, John A. Dowdy, III, Richard Hendrix and others
Nominal Defendant:
Danimer Scientific, Inc.
In Re: Request from Germany
as 1:2022mc00392
Petitioner:
Cook Deutschland GmbH
Respondent:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Boston Scientific Scimed Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Affinity Empowering, Inc. v. Eurofins Scientific, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01843
Plaintiff:
Affinity Empowering, Inc.
Defendant:
Eurofins Scientific, Inc. and Clinical Enterprise, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Perri v. Stephen E. Croskrey et al.
as 1:2021cv01423
Plaintiff:
Ryan Perri
Defendant:
Stephen E. Croskrey, John A. Dowdy, III, Christy Basco and others
Nominal Defendant:
Danimer Scientific, Inc.
Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2021mc00391
Plaintiff:
Nevro Corp.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Pearl IP Licensing LLC v. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
as 1:2021cv01220
Plaintiff:
Pearl IP Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Heritage IP LLC v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2021cv00935
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Heritage IP LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
General Scientific Corporation v. Den-Mat Holdings, LLC
as 1:2021cv00882
Plaintiff:
General Scientific Corporation doing business as SurgiTel
Defendant:
Den-Mat Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Radice v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2021cv00770
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Nicole Radice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00258
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
Plaintiff:
Nevro Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
