Cases 41 - 50 of 168
Bukola Omowole v. William Barr
as 20-2285
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
BUKOLA LOMI OMOWOLE
Dale Hartkemeyer, et al v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-2262
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALE HARTKEMEYER, also known as Seigen and MARK O'KEEFE, Father
Omar Galan-Reyes v. Damon Acuff, et al
as 20-2263
Petitioner:
OMAR GALAN-REYES
Respondent:
DAMON ACUFF, CHAD F. WOLF, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and others
Daniel Lewis Lee v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-2256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Salomon Rodriguez-Varela v. William Barr
as 20-2279
Petitioner:
SALOMON RODRIGUEZ-VARELA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Earlene Branch Peterson, et al v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-2252
Defendant / Appellant:
T. J. WATSON, Warden, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EARLENE BRANCH PETERSON, KIMMA GUREL and MONICA VEILLETTE
Elvira Gutierrez Valdez v. William Barr
as 20-2202
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
ELVIRA M. GUTIERREZ VALDEZ
William Davis, Jr. v. William Barr, et al
as 20-2200
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and C. RIVERS
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR.
Junior Desir v. William Barr, et al
as 20-2194
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL SITKIE, WILLIAM PRIM, CHAD F. WOLF and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUNIOR DESIR
Sergio Meza v. William Barr
as 20-2193
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
SERGIO MEZA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
