Cases 21 - 30 of 424
Guo Castro v. William Barr
as 20-4279
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
GUO YAN LIN CASTRO
Angelina Domingo-Mateo, et al v. William Barr
as 20-4263
Petitioner:
MATEO EDUARDO PEDRO-DOMINGO and ANGELINA DOMINGO-MATEO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Marcio Rodrigues v. William Barr
as 20-4258
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
MARCIO GREY RODRIGUES
Michael Medina Portillo v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-2031
Respondent / Appellee:
TONY H. PHAM, Acting Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID HARDING WETMORE, Chief Appellate Immigration Judge of the Board of Immigration Appeals, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL MEDINA PORTILLO and MICHAEL STEVEN MEDINA PORTILLO
Janet Malam, et al v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 20-1977
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AHAMMAD ALI, ZAID SHAHER MOHAMMAD AL ARAJ, TOMAS CARDONA RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
WAAD BARASH, JOSE MAURICIO GARCIA TOLEDO, JOHANNA WHERNMAN and others
Respondent:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, CHAD F. WOLF, DHS Secretary, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, ICE Deputy Director and others
Petitioner:
JANET MALAM
Anabely Gonzalez-Ortiz, et al v. William Barr
as 20-4248
Petitioner:
ANABELY GONZALEZ-ORTIZ and AMIR GONZALEZ-ORTIZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Eduardo Vasquez-Vasquez v. William Barr
as 20-4227
Petitioner:
EDUARDO REY VASQUEZ-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Dunia Gonzalez-Barboza v. William Barr
as 20-4224
Petitioner:
DUNIA GONZALEZ-BARBOZA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Ndeye Diop v. William Barr
as 20-4225
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
NDEYE SOKHNA DIOP
Guadalupe Vasquez-Vasquez v. William Barr
as 20-4221
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
GUADALUPE VASQUEZ-VASQUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
