Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05873
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lombardo v. Wakefield & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2018cv04228
Plaintiff:
Filippo Lombardo
Defendant:
Wakefield & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Salazar v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00345
Plaintiff:
Consuela Wakefield Salazar
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cartier International A.G. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv04427
Plaintiff:
Cartier International A.G.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhou Zhuqin, zouyulan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv02722
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", zhou zhi wei, Hijiao Zhou and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Netzel et al v. Wakefield & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00659
Plaintiff:
Michael Netzel and Kelly Netzel
Defendant:
Wakefield & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
