Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Laurentano v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00628
Plaintiff:
Sandra Laurentano
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Central Credit Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Vitorino v. WAL-MART Stores, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv01504
Plaintiff:
John Vitorino
Defendant:
WAL-MART Stores, Inc. and Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Heidel v. Coopervision, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00831
Plaintiff:
Amanda Heidel
Defendant:
CooperVision, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Bausch + Lomb Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Denton v. Cooper Vision, Inc et al (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00762
Plaintiff:
Debra Denton
Defendant:
Cooper Vision, Inc. , Alcon Laboratories, Inc. , Bausch + Lomb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015
Pentsak et al v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00803
Plaintiff:
Serge Pentsak and Monika Paske
Defendant:
Alcon Laboratories, Inc., ABB Concise Optical Group, LLC, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Denton v. Cooper Vision, Inc et al (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00762
Plaintiff:
Debra Denton
Defendant:
Cooper Vision, Inc. , Alcon Laboratories, Inc. , Bausch + Lomb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015 Antitrust Litigation
Ondo v. WAL-MART Stores, Inc.
as 6:2015cv01003
Plaintiff:
Chris Ondo
Defendant:
WAL-MART Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Neforos v. Cooper Vision, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00437
Plaintiff:
Megan Neforos
Defendant:
Cooper Vision, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Bausch + Lomb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Poole v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2014cv23519
Plaintiff:
James Poole
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
