Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
De'Andre Thomas v. Chief Parker
as 21-6814
Defendant / Appellee: INVESTIGATOR MAYS, Plea Investigator, LIEUTENANT WALKER, Night Shift Commander, CHIEF PARKER, Chief of Operations/Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DE'ANDRE LAMAR THOMAS
David Meyers v. A. Robinson
as 21-6688
Defendant / Appellee: WAUMMADI, MICHELLE WALKER, Counselor, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Warden I. Hamilton
as 21-6660
Defendant / Appellee: TONYA FOREMAN, DR. ULEP, TINYA FOREMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID MEYERS
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Franklin Richardson
as 21-6239
Defendant: B. ROBERTS, STEPHON, C. HINDENBURG, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee: FRANKLIN RICHARDSON, MCBRIDE, ROGERS
Charles Harbison v. VDOC
as 20-7863
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICER B. SHAFFNER, SGT. OFFICER MAY, LT. JASON HIGGINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES HARBISON
Joseph Mays v. T. Smith
as 20-7540
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee: J. HALFAST, Case Manager, OFFICER SLAYDON, OFFICER GLASS and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jane Doe v. James Dewees
as 20-1736
Defendant / Appellee: MARY K. SMITH, District Court Administrative Clerk, JOYCE SCHAUM, Contractor with CONMED, UNIDENTIFIED CONTRACTOR, CONMED and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE DOE
Eugene Nolan v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7631
Defendant / Appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, LIEUTENANT GIBBS, GRCC, SERGEANT TISDALE, GRCC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: EUGENE D. NOLAN
Javan Mays v. Scott Lewis
as 19-7275
Petitioner / Appellant: JAVAN FREDRICK MAYS, a/k/a Von Frederick Mayes
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN SCOTT LEWIS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?