Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Bianchi v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2012cv01039
Plaintiff:
Doris J Bianchi
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Airgas Merchant Gases LLC, Bechtel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Pneumo Abex Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv01128
Plaintiff:
Linda Ellis
Defendant:
Pneumo Abex Corporation , Pneumo Abex LLC , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Kaiser v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2011cv01121
Plaintiff:
Parnell H Kaiser
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company , Airgas Merchant Gases LLC, Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cross_claimant:
. Sprinkmann Sons Corporation
Cross_defendant:
. Sprinkmann Sons Corporation , AW Chesterton Company , Airgas Merchant Gases LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2011cv01952
Plaintiff:
Dale R Woods
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company , Airgas Merchant Gases LLC, Bayer Crop Science Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
Warren Pumps Inc
Cross_defendant:
Warren Pumps Inc , AW Chesterton Company, Airgas Merchant Gases LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yates v. A. W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00659
Plaintiff:
Barbara Yates
Defendant:
A. W. Chesterton, Inc., Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Allied Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaskett v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
Marlene Plaskett and Marlene Plaskett
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Allied Signal, Inc, American Standard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lacey v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv00156
Plaintiff:
Linda Lacey, Linda Lacey, Linda Lacey and others
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Allied Signal, Inc, American Standard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
