Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wilmore v. Holdren et al
as 1:2009cv06395
Plaintiff:
Philip R Wilmore
Defendant:
Gary E Holdren, Gary L Burge, Wayne Lipski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Goelz v. Holdren et al
as 1:2009cv06396
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Goelz
Defendant:
Gary E Holdren, Gary L Burge, Wayne Lipski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Oakland County Employees' Retirement System v. Massaro et al
as 1:2009cv06284
Defendant:
George E. Massaro, Dubose Ashley, James D. Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Oakland County Employees' Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Fisher et al v. Holdren
as 1:2009cv05475
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fisher and Thomas Fisher
Defendant:
Huron Consulting Group, Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Austin v. Huron Consulting Group Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04842
Plaintiff:
Gary Austin and Gary Austin
Defendant:
Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E Holdren, Gary L Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
DeAngelis v. Huron Consulting Group Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04766
Plaintiff:
Dorothy DeAngelis and Dorothy DeAngelis
Defendant:
Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Liebman v. Huron Consulting Group Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04799
Plaintiff:
Adam Liebman and Adam Liebman
Defendant:
Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Parsons v. Huron Consulting Group Inc.
as 1:2009cv04791
Plaintiff:
Noel M Parsons, Noel M Parsons, Noel M Parsons and others
Defendant:
Huron Consulting Group Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
