Antitrust Cases filed in New York
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Kendal On Hudson, Inc. v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv09496
Plaintiff: Kendal On Hudson, Inc.
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A. , Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. , UBS AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Active Retirement Community, Inc. v. Bank Of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv08273
Plaintiff: Active Retirement Community, Inc.
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., UBS AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Active Retirement Community, Inc. v. Bank Of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2010cv04302
Plaintiff: Active Retirement Community, Inc.
Defendant: Assured Guaranty US Holdings, Inc., Bank of America, N.A Bank Of America, N.A., Bayerische Landesbank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America NA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv04990
Plaintiff: East Bay Municipal Utility District
Defendant: Bank of America NA, Merrill Lynch & Co, Inc., UBS AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City of Redwood City v. Bank of America , N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv04988
Plaintiff: City of Redwood City
Defendant: Bank of America , N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., UBS AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco v. Bank of America , N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv04987
Plaintiff: Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco
Defendant: Bank of America , N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co, Inc., UBS AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City of Richmond v. Bank of America, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv04989
Plaintiff: City of Richmond
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., UBS AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Sacramento Suburban Water District v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.
as 1:2010cv00629
Plaintiff: Sacramento Suburban Water District
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., UBS AG and others
Consolidated_plaintiff: Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Los Angeles World Airports v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.
as 1:2010cv00627
Plaintiff: Los Angeles World Airports
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., UBS AG and others
Consolidated_plaintiff: Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2005md01720
Interested Party: Parkside Movies 14, Hampton Allied Pharmacy, Mon Ami Gabi Development LLC, DBA Mon Ami Gabi - Oakbrook and others
Not Classified By Court: Keewatin Sinclair, Valentine Stores, Inc., Alsaker Corp/Broadway Truck Stops and others
Plaintiff: Joe's Crab Shack - Abingdon MD, Inc., William-Sonoma Inc., Plaintiffs in Twisted Spoke v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. 05-cv-5881 JG-JO and others
Petitioner: Jonathan Lee Riches, Karla F. Solis, D.D.S., Inc. d/b/a LA Holistic Dentistry, Mr Gary Friedman and others
Defendant: Defendants in civil action G.E.S. Bakery, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc,. et al. 05-cv-5879 JG-JO, Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants in civil action Performace Labs, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., et al 05-cv-5869 JG-JO and others
Amicus Curiae: The European Commission, Canadian counsel for defendants in Canadian litigation received from and filed by hand by Canadian counsel, Amici Objecting States and others
Interpleader: MNZ Inc
Respondent: Visa Inc.
Intervenor: Keila Ravelo and Mary Watson
3Rd Party Defendant: Discover
Intervenor Plaintiff: Oneota Community Food Co-op
Claimant: St. Louis Airport Taxi, LLC.
In Re: Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?