Cases 71 - 80 of 167
Wells Fargo Bank v. Beddome et al
as 1:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank
Defendant:
Clarence J. Beddome and Elsie L. Beddome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mangelson et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 2:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
Brek Mangelson and Brooke Mangelson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank , Wells Fargo Home Mortgage , America's Servicing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gonzalez v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 2:2012cv00286
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA , Americas Servicing Company , Meridias Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blackmore v. Wachovia Mortgage et al
as 2:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Blackmore
Defendant:
Wachovia Mortgage and Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mangelsen et al v. America's Servicing Company et al
as 2:2012cv00238
Plaintiff:
Paul Mangelsen , Rosario Mangelsen and Dosh
Defendant:
America's Servicing Company and Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Rochelle Land et al
as 2:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Defendant:
Rochelle Land, David C. Clark, Rochelle B. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 2:2012cv00054
Plaintiff:
Brett Reeves and Nanette Reeves
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells Fargo Bank v. Flangas Crossing et al
as 2:2011cv01144
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank
Defendant:
Flangas Crossing, Magna Mogas and Arthur L. Flangas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
1200 South Development v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 2:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
1200 South Development
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. eTitle Insurance Agency et al
as 2:2011cv01082
Plaintiff:
Lula Jean Thomas
Defendant:
eTitle Insurance Agency , World Savings Bank , Wachovia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
