Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Donyall White-Bey v. Wexford of Indiana LLC, et al
as 21-2744
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC and CHRIS WILLIAMS
Donyall White-Bey v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
as 21-2479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC
Keel McGavok v. Bruce Ipple, et al
as 21-1243
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC and BRUCE IPPLE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEEL MCGAVOK
Roger Graham v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
as 20-2999
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor, MICHELLE LAFLOWER, NIKKI TAFOYA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER GRAHAM
Kurt Kemp v. Alex Platz, et al
as 20-2948
Defendant / Appellee:
BRUCE IPPEL, Doctor, ALEX PLATZ, Doctor, PENELOPE WADLEIGH, N.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KURT J. KEMP
Danny Richards v. Wexford of Indiana LLC, et al
as 20-2567
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, JACKIE WEST-DENNING, Dr., SAMUEL BYRD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Kevin Reaves v. Wexford of Indiana LLC, et al
as 20-1700
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN REAVES
Danny Richards v. Wexford of Indiana, LLC, et al
as 19-2193
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKIE WEST-DENNING, Dr. and WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Arthur Beatty, Sr. v. Michael Person, et al
as 19-1720
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA BERGESON, Medical Director, MICHAEL PERSON, Doctor, TINA COLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BEATTY, SR.
Christopher Dirig, Sr. v. Wexford of Indiana, LLC, et al
as 19-1431
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHRYN HILL, Nurse, REBECCA TRIVETT, Nurse and WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER J. DIRIG, SR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
