Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Whitehurst v. Skechers USA, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00755
Plaintiff: Bryan Whitehurst
Defendant: Skechers USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00326
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In re: Anthony Whitehurst, Jr.
as 16-16091
Petitioner: In re: ANTHONY MARTIZ WHITEHURST, JR.
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Anthony Whitehurst, Jr.
as 16-11917
Petitioner: In re: ANTHONY MARTIZ WHITEHURST, JR.
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. John Whitehurst We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-11097
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JOHN WHITEHURST
USA v. John Whitehurst We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-11095
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JOHN WHITEHURST
USA v. Anthony Whitehurst, Jr.
as 15-13068
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ANTHONY MARTIZ WHITEHURST, JR.
USA v. Troy Whitehurst We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-12428
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TROY DEAN WHITEHURST
Altimas et al v. Whitney et al
as 8:2009cv01845
Plaintiff: Thomas L. Altimas, Thomas L. Altimas, Lise Girard and others
Defendant: Russell Whitney, Michael O. Kane, Kane Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Altimas et al v. Whitney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00682
Plaintiff: Thomas L. Altimas, Thomas L. Altimas, Lise Girard and others
Defendant: Russell Whitney, Michael O. Kane, Kane Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?