Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Stevenson v. VacationRoost et al
as 2:2013cv00995
Plaintiff:
William Stevenson
Defendant:
VacationRoost and Mountain Reservations
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Supragenix v. Rocket Genetics et al
as 2:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Supragenix
Defendant:
Rocket Genetics and Mark J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Emergency Essentials v. Namecheap et al
as 2:2011cv00411
Plaintiff:
Emergency Essentials
Defendant:
Namecheap and William Tingle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Eurosport High Performance v. Turner et al
as 2:2010cv01248
Plaintiff:
Eurosport High Performance
Defendant:
William A. Turner and Turner Motorsport
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
WCDI v. Gay et al
as 2:2010cv00819
Plaintiff:
WCDI
Defendant:
William Gay, David Gavrich and Transload of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Backgate Designs v. Hightower et al
as 2:2009cv01020
Plaintiff:
Backgate Designs and Backgate Designs
Defendant:
William M. Hightower and Manda B. Hightower
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145 Patent Infringement
Jugs Sports v. World Sports Products et al
as 2:2009cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jugs Sports
Defendant:
World Sports Products and William Cole Lay
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
360 Electrical et al v. Chong et al
as 2:2008cv00378
Plaintiff:
360 Electrical, 360 Electrical, Intelliglobe and others
Defendant:
Shui Hung Chong, O Yat, Go-2 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
K-TEC v. Williams-Sonoma
as 2:2008cv00343
Plaintiff:
K-TEC, K-TEC and K-TEC
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Protech Invisible Protection et al v. Warman et al
as 2:2007cv00877
Plaintiff:
Protech Invisible Protection, Protech Invisible Protection, John C. Burdick and others
Defendant:
William J. Warman and VS Protective Shield
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
