Cases 21 - 30 of 347
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv09687
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05500
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Alam Niem v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv05433
Respondent:
United States of Bureau of Consular Affairs, Jane Does 1-10, US Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Nazmul Alam Niem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hossain v. Cuccinelli et al
as 1:2020cv05395
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff:
MD Anwar Hossain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv09201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv09149
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv08971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05104
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Islam v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2020cv08860
Respondent:
JOHN DOES 1-10 (names and number of whom are unknown at present), Texas Service Center, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
Foyzul Islam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
