Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Vincent Banda v. USDHS, et al
as 19-35683
Not Yet Classified: STEVEN LANGFORD, the Geo Group Inc., Warden of Northwest Detention Center, VINCENT FREDRICS BANDA, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 19-55926
Defendant / Appellee: MATTHEW P. DONOVAN, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, RICHARD V. SPENCER, Secretary, Department of the Navy, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al v. William Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16487
Defendant / Appellant: MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, JOHN P. SANDERS, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT and others
Amicus Curiae: PROFESSORS OF IMMIGRATION LAW, STATE OF ARIZONA and IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
S. Mendel v. USDC-CAOAK
as 19-72420
Not Yet Classified: MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission, RAISER-CA LLC, ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation and others
Petitioner: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Not Classified By Court: In re: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Jose Bello Reyes v. Kevin McAleenan, et al
as 19-16441
Respondent / Appellee: MARK MORGAN, Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ERIK BONNAR, Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSE OMAR BELLO REYES
Amicus Curiae: PEN AMERICA
Cesar Luna-Flores, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 19-56020
Respondent / Appellee: KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of DHS, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant: E. G. LUNA-BRAVO, a minor, by and through her mother and Next Friend, Melva Eliu Bravo-Morales, C. LOPEZ-LUNA, minors, by and through their mother and Next Friend Rosario Luna-Flores, ALICIA LUNA-FLORES and others
Yolany Padilla, et al v. ICE, et al
as 19-35565
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID SHINN, Warden, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, MARC J. MOORE, Seattle Field Office Director, ICE and others
Defendant: JOHN P. SANDERS, Acting Commissioner of CBP, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, FKA Department of Social Services, MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Deputy Director of ICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: IBIS GUZMAN, BLANCA ORANTES, BALTAZAR VASQUEZ and others
Emma Nation v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-16443
Defendant / Appellee: DONALD J. TRUMP, BEN CARSON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: EMMA NATION
Daniella Auningputri, et al v. USDOJ, et al
as 19-55869
Plaintiff: KRISTINA LIMBONG, ALEX LONDA, ELDRIDGE WOY and others
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS D. HOMAN, in his official capacity as the Senior Official Performing the duties of the Director of ICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALBERT PALAR, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, ADELENA PALAR and DANIELLA AUNINGPUTRI
Paula Mendez Medina v. USDHS, et al
as 19-71989
Not Classified By Court: In re: PAULA MENDEZ MEDINA
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, TIMOTHY S. ROBBINS, Field Office Director of the Adelanto Detention Facility and others
Petitioner: PAULA MENDEZ MEDINA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?