Cases 1 - 10 of 11,166
ABC Sand and Rock Company Incorporated, et al. v. County of Maricopa, et al.
as 24-2793
Plaintiff:
ABC SAND AND ROCK COMPANY INCORPORATED and DAVID WALTEMATH
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, MARICOPA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, WILLIAM WILEY and others
Cox, et al. v. Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Inc., et al.
as 24-2763
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, in her official capacity as the Director of Oregon Department of Corrections, ASSOCIATION OF OREGON CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES, INC., OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY COX, MARK COX, YVONNE WILLIAMS and others
McNeil v. Molnar, et al.
as 24-2733
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCNEIL
Defendant:
DAVE MOLNAR, Investigator General, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, WILLIAM GLASS, Sergeant and others
Hooper v. County of San Diego, et al.
as 24-2709
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HOOPER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM B. KOLENDER, Sheriff, in his official and individual capacities and others
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 24-2714
Plaintiff:
MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON STUBBS, FAC ECF No. 33, JOSE GUZMAN, FAC ECF No. 33, MATTHEW ROMAN and others
Williams v. O'Malley
as 24-2680
Plaintiff:
RACHEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
White v. Guardian Life Insurance Company, et al.
as 24-2681
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WHITE
Defendant:
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE STAFFING RESOURCE GROUP, INC. GROUP ACCIDENTAL DEATH & DISMEMBERMENT PLAN and DOES 1-10
Schuman, et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, et al.
as 24-2624
Plaintiff:
PETER SCHUMAN and WILLIAM COPLIN
Defendant:
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, ATMEL CORPORATION and ATMEL CORPORATION UNITED STATES SEVERANCE GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM
Welch v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2635
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAM GITTERE, WILLIAM RUEBART, DAVID DRUMMOND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
