Cases 1 - 10 of 12,017
Azcarate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3174
Petitioner:
RAY ANTONIO AZCARATE
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Finnegan v. O'Malley
as 24-3131
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. FINNEGAN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Edmiston v. Saucedo, et al.
as 24-3145
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN EDMISTON
Defendant:
RICARDO SAUCEDO, JAMES WEILAND, C.E.R.T. "Senior and WILLIAM GITTERE, added per #7 Screening Order; #8 AC
United States of America v. Williams
as 24-3158
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLES JAMES WILLIAMS
Franklin v. Town of Laughlin Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Bobby Len Franklin doing business as Daydream Land & Systems Development Company
Defendant:
Town of Laughlin Nevada, Lead Attorney William R. URGA, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Emil v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-3080
Petitioner:
RODNEY L. EMIL
Respondent:
WILLIAM GITTERE, ADAM PAUL LAXALT and TIMOTHY FILSON
Hall v. Flaggs, et al.
as 24-3044
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
GWENERVERE FLAGGS, CHERYL NEWMAN GAINS, GWENDOLYN WILLIAMS and others
Cruz v. Oliver, et al.
as 24-3013
Petitioner:
CARIM CRUZ
Respondent:
RONALD OLIVER, Substituted in Place of William Hutching per [40] Order., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, Substituted by Ronald Oliver per [40] Order.
Williams, et al. v. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
as 24-2970
Plaintiff:
WILLIE WILLIAMS, LADON CLINE and PAUL CONTRERAS
Defendant:
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC.
Schuman, et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, et al.
as 24-2978
Plaintiff:
PETER SCHUMAN and WILLIAM COPLIN
Defendant:
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, ATMEL CORPORATION and ATMEL CORPORATION UNITED STATES SEVERANCE GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
