Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Rainville v. Wright Medical Group, Inc. et al
as FLM/2:14-cv-00109
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Rainville
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Reuffer v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as FLM/2:14-cv-00108
Plaintiff:
Susan Reuffer
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Samuel Ambler et al v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
as CAC/2:13-cv-06178
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ambler and Edward Rubin
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc , Wright Medical Group Inc and Does
Eigenbrode v. Wright Medical Group, Inc, et al
as GAN/1:13-cv-02752
Plaintiff:
Ray Eigenbrode
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group, Inc, and Wright Medical Group Incorporated
Perkins v. Wright Medical Group, Inc, et al
as GAN/1:13-cv-02750
Plaintiff:
Frances C. Perkins
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group, Inc, and Wright Medical Technology Incorporated
Aiello et al v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as GAN/1:13-cv-02739
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Aiello and Gaetano Aiello
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group, Inc,
Lalk v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as GAN/1:13-cv-02742
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Lalk
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Kingery et al v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as GAN/1:13-cv-02743
Plaintiff:
Naomi Kingery and Roger Kingery
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group, Inc,
Gobel v. Wright Medical Group, Inc. et al
as GAN/1:13-cv-02641
Plaintiff:
Donald Gobel
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology Incorporated
Watkins et al v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as GAN/1:13-cv-02652
Plaintiff:
William L. Watkins, III and Sarah P. Watkins
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
