Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Fifth Third Bank v. Florida Cable, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv00270
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
Florida Cable, Inc. , Gary M English , Dana D English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fifth Third Bank v. Florida Cable, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
Florida Cable, Inc. , Gary M English , Dana D English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fifth Third Bank v. MHA 6401 LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
MHA 6401 LLC, MHA 1906 LLC, Manhattan Beauty School, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fifth Third Bank et al v. MHA 8680 LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
MHA 8680 LLC, MHA 1906 LLC, MHA 6401 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Kansas Packing, LLC v. Bahamas Supermarkets, Ltd.
as 1:2011cv23955
Plaintiff:
Kansas Packing, LLC
Defendant:
Bahamas Supermarkets, Ltd., Mark Finlayson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glenmark Generics, Inc., U.S.A. v. Andapharm, LLC et al
as 0:2011cv60626
Plaintiff:
Glenmark Generics, Inc., U.S.A.
Defendant:
Andapharm, LLC, John Doe(s) 1-3, Jane Doe(s) 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUN ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION v. MILLMAN et al
as 1:2007cv00140
Plaintiff:
SUN ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
Defendant:
JACK MILLMAN, XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-20 and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Cantwell et al v. Northern Technologies International Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv60185
Plaintiff:
Evelyna Cantwell, Jack Cantwell and Byrd-Walsh International, LLC
Defendant:
Northern Technologies International Corporation, Northern Technologies International Corporation, Northern Technologies International Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
