Cases 1 - 10 of 301
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01887
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dehua County Gaochuangjing Department Store (individual Business), Fujian Quanzhou Banxian Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Converse Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01793
Plaintiff:
Converse Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Baoding Saikun Import And Export Co., Ltd., DYNAMICS TRADING (CANTON) CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01414
Plaintiff:
Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Shengtao Trading Co., Ltd., Fujian John Imp. & Exp. Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Chapter 4 Corp. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01360
Plaintiff:
Chapter 4 Corp.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Foshan Huajia Communication Electronic Co., Limited, Fujian Dehua Runyayuan Ceramics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01277
Plaintiff:
Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Jinjiang Pinzone Import And Export Trade Co., Ltd., Shanwei Aisen International Trade Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Merch Traffic, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
Merch Traffic, LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Changzhou Xinzhilian Information Technology Co., Ltd., Dongguan EL Sports Equipment Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Robinson v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Howard Robinson
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, GUANGFA MAOYI STORE, Maripa-US and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Boheng Gifts Co., Ltd., Dongguan City Taiyao Hardware Products Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nike, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Yijia Clothing Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Matt Electrical Lighting Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Levi Strauss & Co. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Levi Strauss & Co.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Fenggang Domain Peak E-Commerce Business Department, Fuzhou Baodeyou Trading Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
