Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv04777
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Van Cleef & Arpels SA and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Bobbi George, Yiwu Lanhome Jewelry Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv04223
Plaintiff:
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Yin YuYing, Yin Yu Ying and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv02990
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Tony Grover, Zhang Lianpeng and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nobis Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv00705
Plaintiff:
Nobis Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zou Yong Mei, Zou Yao Jing and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv00632
Plaintiff:
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", liu xue mei, liu xuemei and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
