Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Maeshiro v. Yatsen Holding Limited et al
as 1:2022cv08165
Plaintiff:
Nancy Maeshiro
Defendant:
Yatsen Holding Limited, Jinfeng Huang, Yuwen Chen and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00859
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Banerjee v. Zhangmen Education Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09634
Plaintiff:
Saurav Banerjee
Defendant:
Zhangmen Education Inc., Yi Zhang, Ricky Kwok Yin Ng and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Yanhong Chen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Gao v. Savour Sichuan Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02515
Defendant:
Yi Zhang, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Xiaochun Gao
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lin v. La Vie en Szechuan Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv09507
Plaintiff:
Yunjian Lin
Defendant:
La Vie en Szechuan Restaurant Corp., Yi Zhang and John Wang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Zhang v. Greatland International Travel Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06005
Defendant:
Greatland International Travel Inc., John Doe and Jane Doe #1-10, Wei Jun Lu and others
Plaintiff:
Yi Zhang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ching v. La Vie en Szechuan Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv06313
Plaintiff:
Chu Kwan Ching
Defendant:
La Vie en Szechuan Restaurant Corp., Savour Sichuan Inc., Yi Zhang and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04900
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
