Cases
All Plaintiffs, et al v. BNSF Railway Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-7023
Plaintiff - Appellee: Dakota Granite Company, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, McIntyre Group, Ltd., GVL Pipe & Demolition, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Fayus Enterprises, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Agway Liquidating Trust, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and Maroon Incorporated, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: BNSF Railway Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Appellee: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - MDL No. 1869
ZINIFEX TAYLOR CHEMICALS, INC. v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2007cv02062
Plaintiff: ZINIFEX TAYLOR CHEMICALS, INC.
Defendant: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION - MDL 1869 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007mc00489
Plaintiff: DAKOTA GRANITE COMPANY, MCINTYRE GROUP, LTD., MCINTYRE GROUP, LTD. and others
Defendant: ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Zinifex Taylor Chemicals, Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03274
Plaintiff: Zinifex Taylor Chemicals, Inc.
Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc., BNSF Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?