Cases 31 - 40 of 264
Dorna Sports, S.L. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2023cv03936
Plaintiff:
Dorna Sports, S.L.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, Disney Sports Car Poster Store, GYCOOL Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Marshall Amplification PLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03694
Plaintiff:
Marshall Amplification PLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Anhui Yufengshengze Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd., Cruiser (shenzhen) Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
General Motors LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03553
Plaintiff:
General Motors LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, JRSMART, Cangnan Didi Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Britto Central, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2023cv03783
Plaintiff:
Britto Central, Inc.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, lankinomart, Cicipark and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
FCA US LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03555
Plaintiff:
FCA US LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, A+ Car Accessories Store, China Number Two Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
FCA US LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03304
Plaintiff:
FCA US LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Cross-border Car Products Store, DAAR Belt Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
General Motors LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03174
Plaintiff:
General Motors LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, AOLIZ Store, Auto Personality Parts-ww9 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Mercis B.V. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2023cv03299
Plaintiff:
Mercis B.V.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, Disney Baby Dreamer Store, DUOLI LIFE Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Entertainment One UK Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv02820
Plaintiff:
Entertainment One UK Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, BOYA TOYs Store Store, Crayola Official Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
PS LLC vs Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv02738
Plaintiff:
PS LLC and Protosands LLC
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 20 years old accessories Store, 7-15 Days Delivery and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
