Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tang et al v. CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD., CITIC Limited, CITIC Capital Partners LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eichler v. VBIT Technologies Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv01574
Defendant:
Danh Cong Vo, Phuong D Vo, VBit Technologies Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Eichler
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dettmering et al v. VBit Technologies Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv01482
Defendant:
Danh Cong Vo, Phuong D Vo, VBit Technologies Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Ross Dettmering and Francis Mangubat
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
TANG et al v. CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD. et al
as 1:2022cv01389
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD., HARBIN PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP HOLDING CO., LTD., HARBIN PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP CO., LTD. and others
Not Classified By Court:
DANIEL S. SCHECTER, PHV MICHAEL J. REISS, PHV NICOLE H. SPRINZEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ward v. Camden Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv01758
Plaintiff:
Carlet D. Ward
Defendant:
Camden Police Department, Town of Camden, Wayne White and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gamoran v. Neuberger Berman LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00751
Plaintiff:
Benjamin M. Gamoran
Defendant:
Neuberger Berman LLC, Neuberger Berman Management LLC, Benjamin Segal and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Zazzali v. Swenson et al
as 1:2010cv00950
Plaintiff:
James R. Zazzali
Defendant:
Douglas L. Swenson, Charles Hassard, John M. Mayeron and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
