Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02389
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Cruz et al v. JJ's Asian Fusion Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09098
Defendant:
JJ's Asian Fusion Inc. doing business as JJ's Fusion, Hu Doe and Zi Jie Lin
Plaintiff:
Marcos Cruz and Eloy Martinez Bautista
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cruz et al v. JJ's Asian Fusion Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05120
Defendant:
JJ's Asian Fusion Inc. doing business as JJ's Fusion, Hu Doe and Zi Jie Lin
Plaintiff:
Marcos Cruz and Eloy Martinez Bautista
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lezama v. Austin 88 LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01847
Plaintiff:
Marco Lezama
Defendant:
Zi Jie Lin, Hong Jie Lin, Austin 88 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
