Cases 1 - 10 of 1,262
THE PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL v. APOLLNIA RCZ
as 1:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
THE PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Defendant:
JUDIT APOLLNIA RCZ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
INTRALOT, INC. v. INSTANT WIN GAMING LIMITED
as 1:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
Intralot, Inc.
Defendant:
Instant Win Gaming Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Hodings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
LEVEL 12 PRODUCTIONS, LLC v. BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
LEVEL 12 PRODUCTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION doing business as BBC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
GOLDSTEIN v. OLYMPIA SWIMMING POOL CO., INC.
as 1:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
ALAN JEFFREY GOLDSTEIN
Defendant:
OLYMPIA SWIMMING POOL CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
SCHUMIN v. NEWLANE REAL ESTATE, INC.
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
BEN SCHUMIN
Defendant:
NEWLANE REAL ESTATE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC and STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
WARREN COMMUNICATIONS NEWS, INC. v. NNR GLOBAL LOGISTICS USA, INC.
as 1:2024cv00955
Plaintiff:
WARREN COMMUNICATIONS NEWS, INC.
Defendant:
NNR GLOBAL LOGISTICS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
RADIC v. AUTOS DRIVE AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
IVAN RADIC
Defendant:
AUTOS DRIVE AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
